About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-260447.4 1 (1996-03-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadpr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                          and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                          version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                          involved for public release.


Matter of: AT&T Corporation

File:        B-260447.4

Date:        March 4, 1996

Francis J. O'Toole, Esq., Robert J. Conlan, Jr., Esq., Joseph C. Port, Jr., Esq., and
Michael L. Shore, Esq., Sidley & Austin, and Steven W. DeGeorge, Esq., and
Nathaniel Friends, Esq., AT&T Corporation, for the protester.
Kenneth M. Bruntel, Esq., Paul Shnitzer, Esq., John E. McCarthy, Jr., Esq., and
Jacqueline E. Hand, Esq., Crowell & Moring, for Comsat RSI, Inc., an interested
party.
Douglas G. White, Esq., and H. Jack Shearer, Esq., Defense Information Systems
Agency, for the agency.
Andrew T. Pogany, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. A definitive responsibility criterion is a specific and objective standard,
qualitative or quantitative, that is established by a contracting agency in a
solicitation to measure an offeror's ability to perform a contract. Further, in order
to be a definitive responsibility criterion, the solicitation provision must reasonably
inform offerors that they must demonstrate compliance with the standard as a
precondition to receiving award.

2. A selection decision by a contracting agency is not automatically voided because
of an allegedly inadequate contemporaneous evaluation record. In reviewing a
selection decision, the General Accounting Office looks at the entire record,
including statements and arguments made in response to a protest, so that we can
determine whether the selection decision is supportable; we do not limit our review
to the question of whether the agency determination was properly documented at
the time it was made.

3. Where selection officials reasonably regard proposals as being essentially equal
technically, cost may become the determinative factor in making an award


450425

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most