About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-240365.2 1 (1996-03-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadoo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




GAO             United States
                General Accounting Office
                Washington, D.C. 20548

                Office of the General Counsel




                B-240365.2


                March 14, 1996


                Mr. Stephen M. Bodolay
                Legal Counsel
                Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
                Building 94
                Glynco, GA 31524

                Dear Mr. Bodolay:

                This responds to your request regarding the Federal Law Enforcement Training
                Center's (Center) authority to use its appropriation to pay clergy for invocations at
                graduation ceremonies associated with the completion of training. When we first
                corresponded with you concerning this issue, we agreed with your observation that
                the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution might prohibit
                the use of your appropriation for this purpose. B-240365, Apr. 10, 1991. We further
                noted that the Supreme Court had just granted certiorari in the case of Lee v.
                Weisman, No. 90-1014, March 18, 1991, and that the Supreme Court's decisions in
                that case might provide some useful guidance on the constitutional issues presented
                by your request. The Supreme Court issued its Weisman opinion at the end of June
                1992 (505 U.S. 577), and you have renewed your request for our opinion on the
                propriety of the payment in light of Weisman.

                Unless an expenditure is expressly authorized by law, we resolve questions
                concerning the use of an appropriation for a particular purpose by application of a
                necessary expense analysis. To justify an expenditure as a necessary expense,
                we must determine whether: (1) the expenditure bears a logical relationship to the
                appropriation to be charged; (2) the expenditure is prohibited by law; and (3) the
                expenditure is not otherwise provided for, i.e., within the scope of another
                appropriation or statutory funding scheme. See 63 Comp. Gen. 422, 427-28 (1984);
                B-230304, Mar. 18, 1988. Here, there is no dispute with respect to the first and third
                criteria. The sole issue is whether the Establishment Clause that provides, in
                pertinent part, that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
                religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . . proscribes the use of your
                appropriation to pay clergy for invocations at Center-sponsored graduation
                ceremonies.


30139

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most