About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-261922 1 (1995-11-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptacdi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision


Matter of: Anchorage Enterprises, Inc.

File:       B-261922

Date:     November 7, 1995
Erling T. Johansen, Esq., Davison & Davison, Inc., for the protester.
Richard P. Castiglia, Jr., Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
Christina Sklarew, Esq., and John Van Schaik, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Where solicitation provided that technical and price considerations would be
balanced to determine the best overall value to the government, and specifically
reserved the right to award based on other than the lowest price, decision to award
to offeror with significantly higher technically scored proposal and slightly higher
price was unobjectionable.
DECISION

Anchorage Enterprises, Inc. (Anchorage) protests an award of contract by the
Department of the Air Force to Record and Construction, Inc., under request for
proposals (RFP) No. F10603-94-R-0003. Anchorage alleges that the Air Force's
award decision was based on a flawed evaluation of proposals and was influenced
by an improper bias toward the awardee. We deny the protest.

The solicitation was issued as a competitive 8(a) set-aside for Simplified Acquisition
of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) for Mountain Home Air Force Base in
Idaho. The SABER program provides for small-to-medium size maintenance and
repair and minor construction projects in support of base civil engineers. The RFP
contemplated the award of an indefinite quantity, indefinite delivery 12-month
contract, with 4 option years.

The RFP instructed offerors to submit separate technical and price proposals, and
described the manner in which these would be reviewed by evaluation teams. The
RFP stated that technical and price factors would have equal weight in the source
selection. The solicitation specifically reserved the agency's right to award the
contract to an offeror whose price was not the lowest proposed and stated that the
award would be based on the best overall value to the government.


1000117

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most