About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417909.2,B-417909.3 1 (2020-12-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaecfp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   World Wide Technology, Inc.

File:     B-417909.2; B-417909.3

Date:     December 14, 2020

James  Y. Boland, Esq., Dismas N. Locaria, Esq., Emily A. Unnasch, Esq., Christopher
G. Griesedieck, Esq., and Michael T. Francel, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
Jason A. Carey, Esq., J. Hunter Bennett, Esq., Andrew Guy, Esq., and Michael Pierce,
Esq., Covington & Burling LLP, for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, the
intervenor.
Daniel C. McIntosh, Esq., and Michelle Sabin, Esq., Defense Information Systems
Agency, for the agency.
Charmaine  A. Stevenson, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency's discussions were not meaningful because the agency did not
inform the protester that its price was unreasonably high is denied where the record
shows  that the agency concluded the protester's price was reasonable.

2. Protest that agency's discussions misled the protester to change its technical
solution in a manner that needlessly increased its price is denied where the record
shows  that the agency repeatedly raised its legitimate concerns regarding an aspect of
the protester's proposed technical solution.

3. Protest alleging that the disparities between the offerors' proposed prices and the
government's estimate show that the offerors were not competing on a common basis is
denied where the protester does not identify any solicitation provisions which are vague
or misleading.
DECISION

World Wide Technology, LLC  (WWT),  of St. Louis, Missouri, protests the award of a
contract to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE), of Reston, Virginia, under
request for proposals (RFP) No. HC1084-18-R-0001, issued by the Defense Information
Systems  Agency (DISA), for enterprise storage solution services. The protester
contends that the agency's discussions were misleading and not meaningful. The

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most