About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419265 1 (2020-11-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaecck0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAtOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                           of the United States

                                               DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                             The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                /   7been approved for public release.

Matter of:  U.S. Information Technologies Corporation

File:       B-419265

Date:       November  17, 2020

David S. Black, Esq., Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq., and Hillary J. Freund, Esq., Holland
& Knight, LLP, for the protester.
Pamela  J. Mazza, Esq., Samuel S. Finnerty, Esq., Jacqueline K. Unger, Esq., and
Jonathan I. Pomerance, Esq., Piliero Mazza PLLC, for Credence Management
Solutions, LLC, the intervenor.
Elizabeth Amato, Esq., Gregory Matthews, Michael D. McPeak, Esq., Defense Logistics
Agency, for the agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. GAO  does not have jurisdiction to hear a protest challenging the issuance of a task
order valued below the jurisdictional threshold, based on the additional value of the
option to extend services under Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.217-8, where
the solicitation did not request pricing for the option and the agency did not include the
option in the award.

2. Argument that the awardee should have quoted a higher price does not provide a
basis to find that the value of the task order was higher than the awarded price.

3. Argument that a task order might have been modified to an amount over the
jurisdictional threshold is dismissed where the protester does not establish that the
modification in fact took place.
DECISION

U.S. Information Technologies Corporation (USIT), a small business, of Chantilly,
Virginia, protests the issuance of a task order to Credence Management Solutions, LLC,
of Vienna, Virginia, by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), under request for
quotations (RFQ) No. SP4709-20-Q-1022, which was issued for development and
sustainment services to support the agency's e-Commerce system. USIT argues that
the award to Credence was improper because DLA unreasonably evaluated vendors'

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most