About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418533.2,B-418533.3 1 (2020-06-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaebiq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                         1been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC

File:        B-418533.2; B-418533.3

Date:       June 17, 2020

Daniel R. Forman, Esq., Jonathan M. Baker, Esq., Anuj Vohra, Esq., James G. Peyster,
Esq., Christian N. Curran, Esq., Nkechi A. Kanu, Esq., Zachary H. Schroeder, Esq.,
William B. O'Reilly, Esq., and Rina M. Gashaw, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for the
protester.
James J. McCullough, Esq., Michael J. Anstett, Esq., Christopher Bell, Esq.,
Katherine L. St. Romain, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, and
Deneen J. Melander, Esq., Michael Waldman, Esq., Leslie Esbrook, Esq., and John B.
Goerlich, Esq., Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, for Leidos,
Inc., the intervenor.
John McHugh, Esq., Libbi Finelsen, Esq., and Philip Hadji, Esq., Department of the
Navy, for the agency.
Sarah T. Zaffina, Esq., Alexander 0. Levine, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail,
Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the
decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that the awardee gained an unfair competitive advantage based on the hiring
of a former government employee is denied where the record does not support the
allegation.

2. Protest that agency improperly waived a potential organizational conflict of interest is
denied where the waiver was consistent with the requirements of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation.

3. Protest challenging the agency's technical and management approach evaluations is
denied where the protester fails to demonstrate that, but for the alleged errors, its
proposal would not have been rated lower than the awardee's proposal.

4. Protest alleging that discussions were not meaningful is denied where the agency
was under no obligation to advise the protester of defects introduced by the protester in
its revised proposal.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most