About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417415.2 1 (2019-12-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeazb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                               a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                               been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Inquiries, Inc.

File:        B-417415.2

Date:        December 30, 2019

Craig A. Holman, Esq., and Michael E. Samuels, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer,
LLP, for the protester.
Jonathan T. Williams, Esq., Kathryn V. Flood, Esq, Patrick T. Rothwell, Esq., and
Samuel S. Finnerty, Esq., Piliero Mazza PLLC, for iWorks Corporation, the intervenor.
SoCheung Lee, Esq., Department of Defense, for the agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that the awardee had disqualifying organizational conflicts of interests is
sustained where the record does not show that the agency meaningfully considered the
potential conflicts arising from the awardee's subcontractor's prior and ongoing work on
other contracts.

2. Protest challenging the evaluation of the awardee's proposed program manager is
denied where there record shows that the agency reasonably evaluated the individual's
experience.

3. Protest challenging the evaluation of the awardee's staffing plan is denied where the
agency reasonably found that the awardee proposed efficiencies as compared to the
workload assumptions in the independent government estimate.

4. Protest challenging the agency's price realism analysis is denied where the protester
does not demonstrate that the agency's standard deviation calculation affected the
reasonableness of the analysis.

5. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the awardee's professional
compensation is sustained where the agency's evaluation relied on a comparison of the
offerors' burdened labor rates, rather than salary ranges and fringe benefits offered.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most