About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-416916.5,B-416916.7 1 (2020-04-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeaym0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
                                          1approved for public release.


Matter of:   Peraton Inc.

File:        B-416916.5; B-416916.7

Date:        April 13, 2020

J. Scott Hommer III, Esq., Rebecca E. Pearson, Esq., Emily A. Unnasch, Esq.,
Christopher Griesedieck, Esq., and Taylor A. Hillman, Esq., Venable LLP, for the
protester.
Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Brian G. Walsh, Esq., Cara L. Lasley, Esq., Lindy Bathurst, Esq.,
and Nicholas L. Perry, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for ManTech Advanced Systems
International, Inc., the intervenor.
Tudo N. Pham, Esq., Department of State, for the agency.
Michael Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging scope of agency corrective action is denied where agency
reasonably limited the scope of discussions to address narrow issues previously
identified in outcome prediction alternative dispute resolution.

2. Original awardee qualifies as an intervenor under 4 C.F.R. § 21.0(b)(1) in a pre-
award protest challenging the scope of agency corrective action when the original
awardee and protester are the only offerors still eligible to compete and the protest
alleged that the original awardee should be excluded from the competition.

3. Communications between agency counsel and intervenor's counsel concerning the
scope or nature of agency corrective action are not privileged pursuant to the joint
defense or common interest doctrine because the agency and intervenor lack a
common legal interest in such communications.
DECISION

Peraton, Inc., of Herndon, Virginia, protests the scope of the agency's corrective action
following its prior protest of the issuance of a task order to ManTech Advanced Systems
International, Inc., of Herndon, Virginia, under solicitation No. 19AQMM18R0065. The
task order was issued through the National Institutes of Health CIO-SP3
governmentwide acquisition contract, for server and software deployment services for

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most