About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418469 1 (2020-04-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeawh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States




Decision


Matter of: American Systems Group

File:       B-418469

Date:       April 7, 2020

Ritobrata Banerjee, for the protester.
Geoffrey Chun, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest that services requested under a task order solicitation are outside the scope of
the underlying multiple-award contract is dismissed where the protester cannot
demonstrate prejudice.
DECISION

ASG Solutions Corporation d/b/a American Systems Group (ASG), of San Diego,
California, protests the terms of task order request for proposal (TORP) No. N33191-20-
R-3001, issued by the Department of the Navy for an engineering technician assistant.
The protester asserts that the services sought under the TORP are beyond the scope of
the indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract under which the TORP was
issued.

We dismiss the protest.

On June 1, 2018, the agency issued solicitation No. N001 78-18-R-7000 for the Seaport-
Next Generation IDIQ multiple-award contract for engineering, technical, and
programmatic support services. IDIQ Solicitation at 1, 7. The solicitation provided that
task orders would be issued under the IDIQ contract for two areas of support--
engineering services and program management services. Id. at 7, 8. The solicitation
further divided these areas of support into 23 functional areas. Id. Offerors were
required to submit a technical proposal which demonstrated experience performing
some effort related to at least one of the areas identified by the scopes of work. Id.
at 62. Technical proposals were evaluated as acceptable or unacceptable. Id. Price
was not evaluated. Id. The solicitation provided that the government would make an
award to all qualifying offerors. Id. A qualifying offeror was defined as a responsible

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most