About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-417616.2,B-417616.3,B-417616.4 1 (2020-03-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeavw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAiO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has Decision been approved for public release. Matter of: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. File: B-417616.2; B-417616.3; B-417616.4 Date: March 31, 2020 Michael F. Mason, Esq., Stacy M. Hadeka, Esq., Christine A. Reynolds, Esq., and Adilene Rosales, Esq., Hogan Lovells US LLP; and Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., Carla J. Weiss, Esq., Marc A. Van Allen, Esq., and Lindsay C. Harrison, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for the protester. James J. McCullough, Esq., Michael J. Anstett, Esq., and Katherine L. St. Romain, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP; and J. Scott Hommer, III, Esq., Rebecca E. Pearson, Esq., Emily A. Unnasch, Esq., Christopher G. Griesedieck, Esq., and Taylor A. Hillman, Esq., Venable LLP, for Leidos, Inc., the intervenor. Colleen A. Eagan, Esq., and Anthony J. Balestreri, Esq., Defense Information Systems Agency, for the agency. Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Supplemental protest alleging that agency failed to investigate whether awardee gained an unfair competitive advantage through awardee's retention of a former agency official is dismissed as untimely where it was not filed within 10 days of when protester knew or should have known of its basis of protest. 2. Protest that the agency engaged in misleading discussions which led the protester to increase its proposed direct labor rates is denied where the protester's contention is not supported by the record, and where the protester made its own independent business judgment regarding how to respond to the agency's identified concern. 3. Protest that agency's price realism evaluation of the awardee's proposal was inadequate is denied where the record shows that the agency conducted its price realism analysis using applicable price analysis techniques, and with results that were reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most