About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418339 1 (2020-03-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeavb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                               ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                               a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
Dec ision                                      been approved for public release.



Matter of:   AAR Manufacturing Inc., d/b/a AAR Mobility Systems

File:        B-418339

Date:        March 17, 2020

Paul R. Hurst, Esq., Michael J. Navarre, Esq., and Caitlin T. Conroy, Esq., Steptoe &
Johnson, LLP, for the protester.
Anthony H. Anikeeff, Esq., and Stephen H. Swart, Esq., Williams Mullen, for Taber
Extrusions, LLC, the intervenor.
Captain Seiji Ohashi, Alexis J. Bernstein, Esq., Major Darren S. Gilkes, and Charles R.
Epperson, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency failed to give adequate consideration to a prospective offeror's
organizational conflicts of interest is denied where the agency reasonably evaluated
whether the prospective offeror had an improper ability to shape the ground rules for the
procurement, or unequal access to information, or impaired objectivity to perform the
required effort, and where the protester's assertions fail to present hard facts indicating
the existence of an impermissible conflict.

2. Protest challenging solicitation's past performance evaluation rating scheme as
unduly restrictive of competition is denied where the agency provides a rational
explanation for its requirements and demonstrates that they reasonably relate to the
agency's actual needs.
DECISION

AAR Manufacturing Inc., d/b/a AAR Mobility Systems (AAR), of Cadillac, Michigan,
protests the terms of request for proposals (RFP) No. FA8534-19-R-0001, issued by the
Department of the Air Force for the supply of Next Generation (Next-Gen) air cargo
pallets. AAR argues that a potential competitor, Taber Extrusions, LLC, of Russellville,
Arkansas, has organizational conflicts of interest (OCI) that are unmitigatable and that
the RFP's past performance evaluation criterion is unduly restrictive of competition.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most