About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-418281,B-418281.2,B-418281.3 1 (2020-02-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeasb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has 1been approved for public release. Matter of: Netizen Corporation File: B-418281 ; B-418281.2; B-418281.3 Date: February 21, 2020 Marc Lamer, Esq., Kostos and Lamer, PC, for the protester. Jonathan T. Williams, Esq., Matthew E. Feinberg, Esq., Meghan F. Leemon, Esq., and Patrick K. Burns, Esq., Piliero Mazza PLLC, for BreakPoint Labs, LLC, the intervenor. Walker Moller, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Michael P. Grogan, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Challenge to the agency's evaluation of the awardee's corporate experience is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation's standards for relevancy. 2. Allegation that the agency failed to conduct a price realism analysis is denied because the protester has not alleged or demonstrated that the awardee's price was unrealistic. DECISION Netizen Corporation, a small business of Allentown, Pennsylvania, protests the issuance of a task order to BreakPoint Labs, a small business of Dunn Loring, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP) No. RFQ1394381 1, issued by the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers (Corps), for cybersecurity support services at the Corps' Engineer Research and Development Center's Information Technology Laboratory. The protester contends that the agency's evaluation of BreakPoint's proposal was unreasonable and that the Corps did not perform a price realism analysis as required by the solicitation. We deny the protest. 1 Though the solicitation number suggests that this acquisition was issued as a request for quotations (RFQ), the record reflects that the solicitation was, in fact, a request for proposals (RFP).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most