About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418238 1 (2020-02-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaearl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States
                                         ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
                                         1approved for public release.


Matter of:  ENPAC LLC

File:       B-418238

Date:        February 4, 2020

Michelle F. Kantor, Esq., and William J. Beckley, Esq., McDonald Hopkins LLC, for the
protester.
Ashley Kelly, Esq., Jennifer McNamara, Esq., and Robert E. Sebold, Esq., Defense
Logistics Agency, for the agency.
Michael Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest alleging that agency's decision to cancel a solicitation was made solely for the
purpose of avoiding a protest is denied where the agency's explanation for the decision
was reasonable and there was no evidence that the explanation was pretextual.
DECISION

ENPAC, LLC, of Eastlake, Ohio, challenges the cancellation of request for proposals
(RFP) No. SPE4A6-19-R-0566 issued by the Defense Logistics Agency for spill
containment units (SCUs). The protester contends that the agency's cancellation
decision lacked a reasonable basis and was undertaken for the purpose of avoiding an
agency-level protest filed by Basic Concepts, Inc.

We deny the protest.

BACKGROUND

On August 15, 2019, the agency issued the RFP. Memorandum of Law (MOL) at 1.
The RFP identified four approved models of SCUs, and both ENPAC and Basic
Concepts submitted timely proposals. Id. at 1-2. On September 11, Basic Concepts
filed an agency-level protest alleging that its model of SCU was the only model that met
the product description included in the RFP, and that the other models identified in the
RFP did not actually meet the RFP's stated requirements. Id. at 2.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most