About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417639.2,B-417639.3 1 (2019-09-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadzwy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States
                                         .......................................................................................................................
                                            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approved for public release.


Matter of:  AECOM Management Services, Inc.

File:        B-417639.2; B-417639.3

Date:       September 16, 2019

Richard B. O'Keeffe, Jr., Esq., William A. Roberts, III, Esq., Gary S. Ward, Esq., and
Sarah B. Hansen, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester.
Scott F. Lane, Esq., Katherine S. Nucci, Esq., Christine R. Couvillon, Esq., Timothy
Sullivan, Esq., Edward W. Gray, Jr., Esq., and Jayna M. Rust, Esq., Thompson Coburn
LLP, for DynCorp International, LLC, the intervenor.
Wade L. Brown, Esq., Kelly Sledgister-Stehle, Esq., and Matthew A. McNease, Esq.,
Department of the Army, for the agency.
April Y. Shields, Esq., Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Agency's evaluation of protester's and awardee's proposals under the technical
evaluation factor was reasonable, including the agency's assessment of strengths in
awardee's proposal that ultimately were relied on as discriminators in the source
selection decision.

2. Agency's evaluation of protester's and awardee's proposals under the past
performance evaluation factor was reasonable, including the determination that
awardee's prior performance was more relevant to this procurement than the protester's
prior performance.

3. Protest challenging the agency's best-value tradeoff decision is denied where the
agency documented multiple discriminators justifying the awardee's higher price and
where the underlying evaluation was reasonable.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most