About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-04-355R 1 (2004-01-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadxgg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

   I


7nAccountability * Integrity * Reliability
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548




          B-158766

          January 30, 2004

          The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert
          Speaker of the House
            of Representatives

          Dear Mr. Speaker:

          This letter responds to the requirements of the Competition in Contracting Act
          of 1984, 31 U.S.C. § 3554(e)(2) (2000), that the Comptroller General report to
          Congress each instance in which a federal agency did not fully implement a
          recommendation made by our Office in connection with a bid protest decided the
          prior fiscal year. There were two such occurrences during fiscal year 2003.

          The Two Fiscal Year 2003 Protests

                (1) Consolidated Eng'g Servs., Inc., B-291345, B-291345.2,
                    Dec. 23, 2002, 2002 CPD 220

          The first occurrence of an agency not fully implementing a bid protest decision
          involved a two-phase competition, pursuant to Office of Management and Budget
          (OMB) Circular A-76, to select a commercial offeror to compete against the
          government's most efficient organization (MEO) under the A-76 cost comparison
          process for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the Pentagon Heating and
          Refrigeration Plant (H&RP) in Arlington, Virginia.

          Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. (CESI) protested the Department of
          Defense's (DOD) rejection, as technically unacceptable, of its proposal--the only one
          received from a commercial offeror in the private-sector portion of the A-76
          competition--at the second phase of the competition, essentially for lack of relevant
          experience. We sustained CESI's protest by decision of December 23, 2002,
          concluding that neither the contemporaneous evaluation record nor testimony
          elicited at a hearing that we conducted in this matter reasonably supported the
          agency's decision. We recommended that the agency reinstate CESI's second-phase
          proposal into the competition and compare it with the government's MEO in
          accordance with the procedures set forth in OMB Circular A-76 and the Revised
          Supplemental Handbook. We also recommended that CESI be reimbursed the


GAO-04-355R

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most