About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GGD/OGC-00-51R 1 (2000-02-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadxfo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




~GAO

         Accountability * Integrity * Reliability
United States General Accounting Office                                        General Government Division
Washington, D.C. 20548



                  B-284372

                  February 7, 2000

                  The Honorable James A. Leach
                  Chairman, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs
                  House of Representatives

                  Dear Mr. Chairman:

                  Subject: Role of the Office of Thrift Supervision and Office of the Comptroller of the
                  Currency in the Preemption of State Law

                  This letter responds to your September 21, 1999, request that we provide information on the
                  Office of Thrift Supervision's (OTS) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's
                  (OCC) role in the preemption of state law. As agreed, our objectives were to (1) describe
                  OTS's and OCC's authorities and processes for issuing preemption opinions and regulations,
                  identifying any differences in their approaches; (2) describe how the Alternative Mortgage
                  Transaction Parity Act of 1982 (Parity Act) preempts state law and provide the views of
                  selected state officials on its effect; and (3) describe OTS's and OCC's disclosure procedures
                  for communicating their preemption opinions to federally chartered financial institutions and
                  affected states and the views of selected state officials on these procedures. This letter
                  provides information on these issues.' Enclosure I provides a more detailed discussion of the
                  legal framework for federal preemption and OTS's and OCC's approaches. Enclosure II
                  provides a list of OTS and OCC opinions issued from 1994 through 1999, that concluded state
                  laws were preempted.


                  Background

                  Preemption of state law is rooted in the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which provides
                  that federal law is the supreme law of the land. Because the federal and state governments
                  both have roles in regulating financial institutions, questions can arise as to whether the
                  governing federal statute preempts particular state laws. The courts ultimately are
                  responsible for resolving conflicts between federal and state law; and over the years, they
                  have developed a substantial body of precedent that has guided the analysis of whether any
                  particular federal law or regulation overrides or preempts state law (referred to as
                  preemption analysis).


                  On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a comprehensive piece of financial services legislation, became law. The
                  act contains preemption provisions relating to insurance and privacy. To date, the federal financial institution regulators have
                  not addressed any preemption issue under the act.


GAO/GGD/OGC-00-51R OTS and OCC Role in Preemption


Page I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most