About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

A88273 1 (2009-08-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvtw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  i


       Acc untabi ity I Integrity  Reliability
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548





         August 31, 2009


         Ms. Sherry Hazel
         Audit and Attest Standards
         American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
         1211 Avenue of the Americas
         New York, New York 10036-8775

         Subject: AICPA Auditing Standards Board (ASB) May 2009 Exposure Draft of
         proposed Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) on external confirmations.

         This letter provides the U.S. Government Accountability Office's (GAO) comments on
         the ASB's proposed statement on auditing standards. Except for serious concerns
         about retaining the presumptive requirement to request confirmation of accounts
         receivable, we support the proposed standard. This concern, along with our
         comments on other aspects of the proposed standard, is noted below.

         Presumptive requirement to use external confirmation procedures for
         accounts receivable:
         The ASB is seeking views on its decision to retain the presumptive requirement to use
         external confirmation procedures for accounts receivable through a conforming
         amendment to the proposed SAS, Performing Audit Procedures in Response to
         Assessed Risks and Evaluating the Audit Evidence Obtained (Redrafted).

         The presumptive requirement to confirm accounts receivable is problematic because
         it supplants auditor judgment by presuming that confirmation procedures are the
         most effective audit procedure to address the risk of material misstatement in
         accounts receivable, and directs the auditor to perform the audit using that
         assumption. Rather than requiring auditors to use judgment based on audit risk and
         materiality as the starting point to determine the most effective procedure to obtain
         audit evidence related to accounts receivable, the presumptive requirement directs
         auditors to use the same procedure unless the auditor can justify not using
         confirmations if certain conditions exist.

         The unintended consequences of the presumptive requirement are that it may
         encourage auditors to: (1) minimize the importance of risk and materiality
         assessments of accounts receivable, since the procedures to be performed on
         accounts receivable are predetermined; (2) spend too much time performing

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most