About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-414672.5 1 (2018-10-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadveu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States r- ...................................................................................................................... DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Decision The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. ....................................................................................................................... Matter of: Technatomy Corporation File: B-414672.5 Date: October 10, 2018 James S. Phillips, Esq., and Julie M. Nichols, Esq., Roeder, Cochran, Phillips, PLLC, for the protester. Daniel R. Forman, Esq., and Laura J. Mitchell Baker, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for Vencore, Inc.; and Deneen J. Melander, Esq., Richard A. Sauber, Esq., and Lanora C. Pettit, Esq., Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, and Kenneth M. Reiss, Esq., Northrop Grumman Corporation, for Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, the intervenors. Sarah L. Carroll, Esq., and Aubri Dubose, Esq., Defense Information Systems Agency, for the agency. Elizabeth Witwer, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of price is sustained where the agency failed to reasonably determine whether offerors' proposed prices were fair and reasonable. 2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's proposal under the most important non-price factor, the innovation factor, is denied where there is no evidence that the protester was prejudiced by any alleged evaluation errors. 3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of awardees' proposals under the innovation factor is denied where the record reflects that the agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation. 4. Protest alleging that the agency identified strengths in other offerors' proposals, but unreasonably failed to recognize similar strengths in the protester's proposal is denied where the agency provided a meaningful explanation for differences in its assignment of strengths to the proposals.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most