About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-416890 1 (2018-10-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvdj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                           of the United States




Decision


Matter of: Celeris Systems, Inc

File:       B-416890

Date:       October 11, 2018

Bryan B. Arnold, Esq., Gordee, Nowicki & Blakeney, LLP, for the protester.
Richard B. Oliver, Esq., and J. Matthew Carter, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
LLP, for INDUS Technology, Inc., the intervenor.
Robert Jusko, Esq., Trenton J. Bowen, Esq., and James C. Brent, Esq., Department of
the Navy, for the agency.
Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest that military agency misevaluated proposals is dismissed as premature where
required post-award debriefing consistent with extended debriefing procedures of
10 U.S.C. § 2305(b)(5)(B)(vii)-(b)(5)(C) had commenced, but agency had not responded
to protester's questions, so debriefing had not concluded when protest was filed.
DECISION

Celeris Systems, Inc., of Anaheim, California, a small business, protests the issuance of
a task order to INDUS Technology, Inc., of San Diego, California, also a small business,
under SeaPort-e request for proposals (RFP) No. N0025317R3012, issued by the
Department of the Navy, Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Keyport, for
engineering, technical, infrastructure, logistic, business, and underwater vehicle
operational site support services for the Navy's Pacific Fleet Test and Operational
Assessment Division, NUWC Detachment Pacific, Pearl Harbor Torpedo Division, and
Fleet Technical Support Division, primarily in Hawaii and Guam, as well as Japan and
other locations. Celeris, the incumbent contractor, argues that the Navy misevaluated
its task order proposal.

We dismiss the protest.

Our Bid Protest Regulations provide that we will not consider a protest challenging a
procurement conducted on the basis of competitive proposals, where a debriefing is
required if the protest is filed before the debriefing date offered to the protester; the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most