About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-416488 1 (2018-08-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvbj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



G     A     O       U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                          .......................................................................................................................
                                             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Valiant Government Services, LLC

File:        B-416488

Date:        August 30, 2018

Aron C. Beezley, Esq., Lisa A. Markman, Esq., and Sarah S. Osborne, Esq., Bradley
Arant Boult Cummings LLP, for the protester.
Adam K. Lasky, Esq., David Y. Yang, Esq., and Daniel P. Radthorne, Esq., Oles
Morrison Rinker & Baker, LLP, for J&J Maintenance, Inc., d/b/a J&J Worldwide
Services, the intervenor.
Steven W. Feldman, Esq., and Margaret P. Simmons, Esq., Department of the Army, for
the agency.
Todd C. Culliton, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest allegation that the agency was required to select protester for award where
the protester received identical adjectival ratings and was lower-priced is dismissed
because an agency is required to look beyond the adjectival ratings and qualitatively
compare the relative advantages and disadvantages associated with the proposals.

2. Protest allegation that the agency inadequately documented its tradeoff decision is
denied where the record shows that the agency specifically compared the advantages
and disadvantages associated with the proposals.

3. Protest allegation that the agency's tradeoff decision was unreasonable is denied
where the record shows that it was in accordance with stated evaluation criteria and
considered all of the advantages and disadvantages associated with the proposals.
DECISION

Valiant Government Services, LLC (Valiant), of McLean, Virginia, protests the issuance
of a task order to J&J Maintenance, Inc., d/b/a/ J&J Worldwide Services, of Austin,
Texas (J&J), under request for proposals (RFP) No. W912DY-15-D-OOXX, issued by the
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, for operations and maintenance services.
Valiant alleges that the agency unreasonably conducted its best-value tradeoff analysis.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most