About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-416211,B-416211.2,B-416211.3,B-416211.4 1 (2018-07-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaduxu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has Decision been approved for public release. D e c is io ...................................................................................................................... Matter of: Raytheon Company File: B-416211; B-416211.2; B-416211.3; B-416211.4 Date: July 10, 2018 Mark D. Colley, Esq., Stuart W. Turner, Esq., Dana E. Koffman, Esq., Amanda J. Sherwood, Esq., and Nathaniel E. Castellano, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, for the protester. Thomas P. Humphrey, Esq., John E. McCarthy Jr., Esq., Anuj Vohra, Esq., James G. Peyster, Esq., Robert J. Sneckenberg, Esq., Rosamond Z. Xiang, Esq., and Hart W. Wood, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for Lockheed Martin Rotary and Mission Systems, the intervenor. Jonathan A. Hardage, Esq., and Deborah Muldoon, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that the awardee violated the Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) is dismissed where the protester did not give the required notice to the agency prior to filing its protest at GAO. Supplemental protest alleging that the agency failed to reasonably investigate whether the awardee's actions violated the PIA is dismissed where the argument is based on the same information in the original PIA allegation. 2. Protest that the agency unreasonably and unequally evaluated offerors' technical proposals is denied where, despite errors in the evaluation, the record does not show that the protester was prejudiced by such errors. 3. Protest challenging the conduct of discussions with offerors is denied where, although the agency misled the protester regarding one aspect of its proposal, the record does not show that the protester was prejudiced by this error. 4. Protest that the source selection authority (SSA) failed to exercise independent judgment in making the award is denied where the award decision states that the SSA independently reviewed and concurred with the evaluations of the offerors' proposals and the award recommendation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most