About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-416244 1 (2018-07-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaduwm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States




Decision


Matter of:   Buffalo Computer Graphics, Inc.

File:        B-416244

Date:       July 17, 2018

Kevin Williams, Buffalo Computer Graphics, for the protester.
Gabriel D. Soil, Esq., and William H. Butterfield, Esq., Department of Homeland
Security, for the agency.
Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency ignored awardee's proposed prices that were allegedly too low is
dismissed where solicitation for fixed-price contract did not provide for price realism
assessment, and therefore protest allegations did not state a valid basis of protest.

2. Protest that solicitation created unfair competition where under earlier canceled
solicitation protester's price had been released to competitors is dismissed as untimely
where protest was filed after award of new contract, rather than before the closing date
for submission of proposals.

3. Protest that agency misevaluated proposals is denied where evaluation was
reasonable and consistent with evaluation criteria in solicitation.
DECISION

Buffalo Computer Graphics, Inc., of Blasdell, New York, a small business, protests the
award of a contract to NAVSIM Services, Inc., of Buffalo, New York, also a small
business, under request for proposals (RFP) No. 70Z02318RP04001 00, issued by the
Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard (USCG), to supply one
or more commercial ship's navigation simulators for the USCG Academy, in
New London, Connecticut. Buffalo argues that the USCG improperly released its
pricing information to competitors, misevaluated the firm's technical proposal,
misevaluated all proposals under the price/cost factor, and misevaluated the awardee's
proposal with respect to the limitations on subcontracting clause.


We dismiss the protest in part and deny it in part.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most