About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-410441.14 1 (2018-04-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadure0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                                DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                              The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                              a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
Decision                                     .approved for public release.



Matter of: TRAX International Corporation

File:        B-410441.14

Date:     April 12, 2018

Amy Laderberg O'Sullivan, Esq., James G. Peyster, Esq., Olivia L. Lynch, Esq., and
Robert J. Sneckenberg, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for the protester.
Evan C. Williams, Esq., and Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
agency.
Evan D. Wesser, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest alleging that the solicitation is ambiguous or otherwise defective with respect to
anticipated overtime hours is denied where the protester's interpretation of the
solicitation is not reasonably supported and its allegations are otherwise premature as
they merely anticipate that the agency will evaluate proposals unreasonably.
DECISION

TRAX International Corporation, of Las Vegas, Nevada, protests the terms of request
for proposals (RFP) No. W9124R-1 3-R-0001, which was issued by the Department of
the Army, for mission test support services at the United States Army Yuma Proving
Ground in Arizona. TRAX primarily alleges that the amendments to the RFP issued as
part of the agency's corrective action taken in response to multiple rounds of protest
before our Office and the United States Court of Federal Claims are ambiguous, vague,
and fail to provide a reasonable basis for offerors to intelligently prepare their respective
proposals or for the agency to evaluate them on a common basis.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most