About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-415565.2,B-415565.3 1 (2018-02-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadunl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has De is ion .been approved for public release. Matter of: DCR Services & Construction, Inc. File: B-415565.2; B-415565.3 Date: February 13, 2018 David I. Hayden, Esq., and Jackson W. Moore, Jr., Esq., Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP, for the protester. David A. Rose, Esq., The Rose Consulting Law Firm, LLC, for Outside the Box LLC, the intervenor. Captain Jeremy D. Burkhart, and Brenda S. Quinn, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Lois Hanshaw, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest alleging that a solicitation amendment created a latent ambiguity is dismissed as untimely where the protest was filed after the next closing time for receipt of proposals and the protester's own arguments show that it was aware of any alleged ambiguity upon receipt of the amendment. 2. The protester is not an interested party to challenge an award where the record shows that even if the protest were sustained, the protester would not be next in line for award. DECISION DCR Services & Construction, Inc. (DCR), of Raleigh, North Carolina, protests the award of indefinite- delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts to six companies under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91247-16-R-0006, issued by the Department of the Army, for a broad range of construction services at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. DCR challenges the agency's evaluation of select awardees' proposals, including an allegation that three awardees cannot meet the RFP's requirements and are ineligible for award. The protester also asserts that the solicitation contained a latent ambiguity that resulted in a disparate evaluation of proposals. We dismiss the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most