About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-415218,B-415218.2,B-415218.3,B-415218.4,B-415218.5 1 (2017-12-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadumr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States ....................................................................................................................... DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Matter of: Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.; Altamira Technologies Corporation File: B-415218; B-415218.2; B-415218.3; B-415218.4; B-415218.5 Date: December 11, 2017 Mark D. Colley, Esq., Dominique L. Casimir, Esq., Nathaniel E. Castellano, Esq., Michael E. Samuels, Esq., and E. Christopher Beeler, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.; David E. Fletcher, Esq., Christopher J. Kimball, Esq., Erin Estevez, Esq., and Amy S. Josselyn, Esq., Cooley LLP, for Altamira Technologies Corporation, the protesters. Daniel R. Forman, Esq., Christian N. Curran, Esq., Stephanie L. Crawford, Esq., and Monica R. Sterling, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc., the intervenor. Robert B. Neill, Esq., and Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Paula J. Haurilesko, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that awardee failed to comply with solicitation requirement to provide pricing for all proposed subcontractors is denied, where the solicitation required pricing only for subcontractors proposed to perform the required level of effort identified in the pricing matrix. 2. Protest that the agency failed to appropriately assess the realism of the awardee's labor rates is denied, where the record shows that the agency took into consideration the unique features of the proposal. 3. Protest that the agency treated offerors unequally with respect to its cost realism analysis is denied, where the record shows that the agency reasonably upwardly adjusted the protester's labor rates because the protester failed to adequately support the rates, and did not adjust the awardee's subcontractors' rates because they were fixed ceiling rates. 4. Protest that the agency failed to engage in meaningful discussions is denied, where the agency found the protester's overhead rates to be fair and reasonable.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most