About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-415400,B-415400.2,B-415400.3 1 (2018-01-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadugb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States

                                            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                 Ia GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approvedforpublic release.


Matter of:   Ruchman and Associates, Inc.

File:     B-415400; B-415400.2; B-415400.3

Date:     January 2, 2018

Thomas P. McLish, Esq., Elise A. Farrell, Esq., Joseph W. Whitehead, Esq., and Scott
M. Heinberg, Esq., Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, for the protester.
Daniel R. Forman, Esq., Elizabeth Buehler, Esq., Charles Baek, Esq., and Rosamond
Xiang, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for Information Technology Coalition, Inc., the
intervenor.
James E. Hicks, Esq., and Susan M. Colarco, Esq., Department of Justice, for the
agency.
Stephanie B. Magnell, Esq., and Amy B. Pereira, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protester's challenge to the establishment of a blanket purchase agreement on the
grounds that it includes items not on the awardee's Federal Supply Schedule is denied,
where the record and the agency's explanation show that the agency had a reasonable
basis for its decision to accept the vendor's proposed labor categories.

2. Protest challenging the agency's price realism analysis is denied, where the agency
evaluated the realism of proposed prices in accordance with the solicitation and was not
required to conduct an in-depth analysis of vendors' labor mixes in the manner argued
by the protester.

3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's quotation is dismissed
where the protester is not an interested party because, even if it prevails, it is not in line
for selection.
DECISION

Ruchman and Associates, Inc. (Ruchman), of Jessup, Maryland, a small business,
protests the establishment of a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) with Information
Technology Coalition, Inc. (ITC), of Alexandria, Virginia, a service-disabled veteran-
owned small business, pursuant to request for quotations (RFQ) No. DJD-1 7-Q-0081,
issued by the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), for

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most