About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-415559,B-415559.2 1 (2018-01-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadufk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                               a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
Decision                                       been approved for public release.



Matter of: Systems Plus, Inc.

File:     B-415559; B-415559.2

Date:     January 12, 2018

Richard B. Oliver, Esq., and J. Matthew Carter, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
LLP, for the protester.
Erin L. Felix, Esq., and Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq., Polsinelli PC, for Advanced Concepts
and Technologies, Inc., the intervenor.
Andrew Lieberman, Esq., and Matthew Faust, Esq., Department of Homeland Security,
for the agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that the agency's evaluation of proposals improperly departed from the
process set forth in the solicitation is denied where the agency's decision to evaluate
more proposals than anticipated by the solicitation did not prejudice the protester.

2. Protest that the agency failed to evaluate the realism of the awardee's proposed
price is denied where the solicitation did not provide for such an evaluation.

3. Protest that the agency failed to reasonably evaluate the awardee's proposed
transition plan is denied where, contrary to the protester's allegation, the solicitation did
not expressly require vendors' plans to address whether proposed key personnel had
completed background investigations.

4. Protest that the awardee engaged in an improper bait and switch scheme is denied
where the record does not show that the awardee misrepresented its intention to
provide personnel identified in its proposal.
DECISION

Systems Plus, Inc., a small business, of Rockville, Maryland, protests the issuance of a
task order to Advanced Concepts and Technologies, Inc. (ACT), also a small business,
of Arlington, Virginia, by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Customs and
Border Protection (CBP), under task order request for proposals (TORFP)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most