About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-415262,B-415262.2 1 (2017-12-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadudc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



G     A     O       U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                              The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                              a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
Decision                                       been approved for public release.



Matter of: Arch Systems, LLC; KEN Consulting, Inc.

File:     B-415262; B-415262.2

Date:     December 12, 2017

Andrew J. Mohr, Esq., Catherine K. Kroll, Esq., John J. O'Brien, Esq., and Daniel
Strouse, Esq., Cohen Mohr LLP, for Arch Systems, LLC; and Ira E. Hoffman, Esq.,
Butzel Long, PC, for KEN Consulting, Inc., the protesters.
Christopher R. Shiplett, Esq., Randolph Law, PLLC, for Capitol Bridge, LLC, the
intervenor.
Erin V. Podolny, Esq., and Douglas Kornreich, Esq., Department of Health and Human
Services, for the agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protests challenging the agency's decision not to allow offerors to make oral
presentations are denied where the agency reasonably interpreted the solicitation as
not requiring such presentations.

2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the realism of the awardee's proposed
price is denied where the agency's realism analysis reasonably assessed whether the
awardee's proposed price was consistent with its proposed technical approach and
where the solicitation did not require offerors to submit the type of information the
protester contends should have been evaluated.

3. Protest alleging that the difference between the offerors' proposed prices shows that
they were not competing on a common basis is denied where the protester does not
identify any solicitation provisions which are vague or misleading.
DECISION

Arch Systems, LLC, of Baltimore, Maryland, and KEN Consulting, Inc., of Silver Spring,
Maryland, protest the award of a contract to Capitol Bridge, LLC, of Arlington, Virginia,
under request for proposals (RFP) No. CMS-2016-8A-0008, which was issued by the
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) for workers' compensation review support services. The protesters

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most