About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GG-8-257 1 (1978-06-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtrb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                     42

                       COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                                 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




     B-185522
     GG8-257
                                                             JUN 7  1978

     The Honorable Harry F. Byrd, Jr.
     United States Senate

     Dear Senator Byrd:

          In your letter dated May 9, 1978, you requested that we prepare a
     report on the budgetary impact of existing and prospective labor con-
     tract settlements in New York City.. In a subsequent discussion with
     your office we advised that while we have been following the status of
     the city's labor negotiations, we ate unable to furnish definitive
     answers to your questions because those negotiations are still in'
     process. Rather than delay responding, however, we would like to fur-
     nish you sane of the preliminary information which we have developed.

          Essentially, there are three main sets of negotiations the city
     is faced with: (1) the transit workers' contracts expired March 31,
     1978; (2) the main body of municipal workers are covered by contracts
     expiring June 30, 1978; and (3) the teachers' contracts expire in
     September 1978. The teachers, however, are negotiating in a coalition
     with the main body of municipal workers. The police and fire unions,
     on the other hand, have excluded themselves from the coalition and will
     negotiate independently. As of May 31, 1978, the city has negotiated
     a proposed agreement with the transit workers and they were in active
     negotiations with the coalition of municipal workers. The transit con-
     tract had not yet been accepted by the union membership, and, in fact,
     the union leaders had made public statements indicating that they might
     attempt to re-open negotiations with the city if the terms offered to
     the coalition exceeded the terms they had won. In essence, then, no
     contracts have been finally settled as of May 31, 1978.

          Assuming that the contracts might offer equal benefits to all em-
     ployees %hen finally negotiated, we analyzed the proposed transit con-
     tract and projected it over all municipal employees. Our projections.
     indicated that the transit contract over 2 years (fiscal years 1979 and
     1980) would cost the city $18 million and those same benefits extended
     to the main body of municipal employees over the same 2-year period
     would cost the city approximately $870 million.




ii

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most