About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413526.4,B-413526.5,B-413526.6,B-413526.7 1 (2017-04-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtmq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States
                                         .......................................................................................................................
                                            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approved for public release.


Matter of:  SITEC Consulting, LLC; VariQ Corporation; Logistics Systems, Inc.

File:        B-413526.4; B-413526.5; B-413526.6; B-413526.7

Date:       April 3, 2017

Joseph G. Billings, Esq., and Katherine B. Burrows, Esq., Miles & Stockbridge P.C., for
SITEC Consulting, LLC; Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Tracye Winfrey Howard, Esq., Kendra
P. Norwood, Esq., and Moshe B. Broder, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for VariQ Corporation;
and Pamela J. Mazza, Esq., Kathryn V. Flood, Esq., Michelle E. Litteken, Esq., Julia
Di Vito, Esq., and Timothy F. Valley, Esq., Piliero Mazza PLLC, for Logistics Systems,
Inc., the protesters.
Lee Dougherty, Esq., and Katherine A. Straw, Esq., Montgomery Fazzone PLLC, for
Computer World Services Corporation, the intervenor.
Robert A. Mangrum, Esq., Department of Homeland Security, for the agency.
Kenneth Kilgour, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protests challenging the agency's evaluation of technical proposals are denied
where the evaluations were reasonable, performed in accordance with the solicitation
evaluation criteria, and equal.

2. Protests challenging the agency's failure to conduct an adequate risk assessment of
the awardee's price are actually challenges that the agency failed to perform a price
realism analysis and, where the solicitation did not provide for a price realism analysis,
such challenges are without merit.

3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of past performance is sustained where
the agency concedes errors in its past performance evaluation and the record
establishes that one protester was prejudiced.
DECISION

SITEC Consulting, LLC, of Cambridge, Maryland, VariQ Corporation, of Washington,
DC, and Logistics Systems, Inc. (LSI), of Washington, DC, protest the issuance of a
task order to Computer World Services Corporation (CWS), of Washington, DC, under
request for quotations (RFQ) No. HSCG79-16-Q-PFX056, which was issued by the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most