About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-413220.4,B-413220.5,B-413220.7,B-413220.8,B-413220.9 1 (2017-05-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtkz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE I The decision issued on the date below was subject to Dsa GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has D been approved for public release. Matter of: SRA International, Inc.; NTT DATA Services Federal Government, Inc. File: B-413220.4; B-413220.5; B-413220.7; B-413220.8; B-413220.9 Date: May 19, 2017 Dominique L. Casimir, Esq., Dana E. Koffman, Esq., Michael E. Samuels, Esq., and Lauren J. Schlanger, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, for SRA International, Inc.; and Craig A. Holman, Esq., Kara L. Daniels, Esq., E. Christopher Beeler, Esq., and Nicole B. Neuman, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, for NTT DATA Services Federal Government, Inc., the protesters. Neil H. O'Donnell, Esq., Jeffery M. Chiow, Esq., Lucas T. Hanback, Esq., and Stephen L. Bacon, Esq., Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC, for CGI Federal Inc.; Jerald S. Howe, Jr., Esq., James J. McCullough, Esq., Michael J. Anstett, Esq., Webster M. Beary, Esq., and Anayansi Rodriguez, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, for Leidos Innovations Corporation; and Gregory H. Petkoff, Esq., Satenik Harutyunyan, Esq., and Carrie F. Apfel, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for ActioNet, Inc., the intervenors. Michael L. Norris, Esq., Robin A. Baum, Esq., and Daniel D. Straus, Esq., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, for the agency. Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protests challenging the evaluation of protesters' technical quotations are denied where the evaluations were reasonable and consistent with the solicitation. Where protester's quotation was reasonably deemed technically unacceptable under one evaluation factor, protester cannot establish prejudice with respect to alleged evaluation errors under remaining factors. 2. Protest arguing that the agency failed to conduct equal and meaningful discussions is denied where the record reflects that the agency did not enter into discussions with any vendors; exchanges with the protester and an awardee were clarifications. 3. Protest challenging the agency's award decisions is denied where award to a vendor that submitted less advantageous labor rates was not inconsistent with solicitation's best-value award scheme under which technical superiority is more important than price.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most