About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413558.4 1 (2017-02-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtbt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: 4H Construction Corporation

         File:        B-413558.4

         Date:     February 8, 2017

         S. Leo Arnold, Esq., Ashley, Ashley & Arnold, for the protester.
         James W. Cullum, Esq., Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, for the
         agency.
         Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest challenging propriety of government estimate is dismissed for failure to
         diligently pursue the information necessary to raise the allegation where record
         shows that protester was afforded an opportunity to exchange its bid estimate
         information with the agency's government estimate information but the protester
         declined to make the exchange.
         DECISION

         4H Construction Corporation, of Cleveland, Mississippi, protests the actions of the
         Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, in connection with solicitation No.
         W9127S-16-B-0001, issued to acquire dredging services. 4H argues that the
         agency unreasonably has determined to convert the acquisition from a sealed bid
         procurement to a negotiated procurement based on a finding that the prices
         received in response to the invitation for bids (IFB) were unreasonably high.

         We dismiss the protest.

         The agency issued an IFB to obtain dredging services for a base year and two
         1-year options. In response to the IFB, the agency received three timely bids by the
         July 28, 2016, bid opening date, including the bid of the protester, which was the
         low bid received. Agency Report (AR) exh. 11, Bid Abstract. After reviewing the
         bids, the agency determined that all three were unreasonably high priced, and that it
         could not make award on the basis of the bids submitted. In this connection, the
         record shows that the agency made its determination regarding the
         unreasonableness of the prices by comparing them to a government estimate

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most