About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413559.3,B-413559.4,B-413559.6,B-413559.7 1 (2017-01-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsyg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Sevatec, Inc.; InfoReliance Corporation; Enterprise Information
                      Services, Inc.; Buchanan & Edwards, Inc.

         File:     B-413559.3; B-413559.4; B-413559.6; B-413559.7

         Date:     January 11, 2017

         William A. Shook, Esq., The Law Offices of William A. Shook PLLC, for Sevatec,
         Inc., and InfoReliance Corporation; Alexander J. Brittin, Esq., Brittin Law Group,
         PLLC, for Enterprise Information Services, Inc.; John E. Jensen, Esq., and Selena
         M. Brady Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, for Buchanan & Edwards,
         Inc., protesters.
         Charles McCarthy, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency.
         Peter D. Verchinski, Esq., and Amy B. Pereira, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest that use of a highest technically rated offerors with a fair and reasonable
         price evaluation scheme is impermissible for failing to properly consider price is
         denied; the Federal Acquisition Regulation permits agencies to use any one or a
         combination of source selection approaches to obtain the best value.

         2. Protest that agency is improperly assigning points to small businesses under the
         solicitation's evaluation scheme is denied where the protesters have not shown that
         the agency's allocation of points is unreasonable, or otherwise alleged that the
         agency is engaging in improper disparate treatment.

         3. Protest that agency is making an insufficient number of awards to ensure
         adequate competition at the task order level is denied where record shows that the
         agency intends to award approximately 60 contracts, and has taken other steps to
         encourage competition at the task order level.
         DECISION

         Sevatec, Inc., of Fairfax, Virginia; InfoReliance Corporation, of Fairfax, Virginia;
         Enterprise Information Services, Inc. (EIS), of Vienna, Virginia; and Buchanan &
         Edwards, Inc. (B&E), of Arlington, Virginia, protest the terms of request for
         proposals (RFP) No. QTA0016JCA0003, issued by the General Services

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most