About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-412860.4,B-412860.5 1 (2016-12-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsxd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O Comptroller General Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: Imagine One Technology & Management, Ltd. File: B-412860.4; B-412860.5 Date: December 9, 2016 Alex D. Tomaszczuk, Esq., Alexander B. Ginsburg, Esq., and Meghan D. Doherty, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, for the protester. Kevin P. Mullen, Esq., Charles L. Capito, Esq., and Rachael K. Plymale, Esq. Morrison & Foerster LLP, for Precise Systems, Inc., the intervenor. Stacey H. Campbell, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency. Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest challenging the evaluation of the offerors' technical proposals is denied where the evaluations were reasonable and did not reflect unequal treatment. 2. Protest challenging the evaluation of the realism of the offerors' proposed costs is denied where the agency reasonably evaluated the awardee's proposed indirect rates, and where the balance of the allegations, if meritorious, would not make the protester's evaluated cost lower than the awardee's. 3. Protest that the awardee received an advantage arising from the improper disclosure of information by its outside counsel, in violation of the protective order issued by our Office, is denied where, despite the improper disclosure, there is not a prejudicial violation of any procurement law or regulation. 4. Protest that the agency improperly allowed the awardee to revise its proposal beyond the scope of instructions during discussions is denied where offerors were not restricted in making revisions in the manner argued by the protester. DECISION Imagine One Technology & Management, Ltd., of Colonial Beach, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task order to Precise Systems, Inc., of Lexington Park, Maryland, by the Department of the Navy, Naval Air Systems Command, under request for proposals (RFP) No. N00024-15-R-3217, for project management support services.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most