About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-413390.4 1 (2016-10-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsrm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A 0 Comptroller General Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Matter of: WILLCOR, Inc. File: B-413390.4 Date: October 24, 2016 Susan Warshaw Ebner, Esq., and Jacqueline R. Scott, Esq., Fortney & Scott, LLC, for the protester. Egon F. Donnarumma, Esq., and James B. Wyatt, Esq., National Security Agency, for the agency. Alexander 0. Levine, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's proposal as unacceptable is denied where the agency reasonably found that the protester's proposal did not adequately address solicitation requirements. DECISION WILLCOR, Inc., a small business located in College Park, Maryland, protests the elimination of its proposal from the competition conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) under request for proposals (RFP) No. H98230-14-R-0069, for business, engineering, information technology, operations, and training support services. The protester argues that the agency's evaluation of its proposal was unreasonable. We deny the protest. BACKGROUND The solicitation was issued on July 21, 2014 as a small business set-aside. The RFP anticipated the issuance of up to 15 indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts with fixed-price, cost-reimbursement, incentive, time-and-materials, and labor-hour task orders. Contracting Officer Statement (COS) at 1-2. The RFP proposal evaluation criteria (PEC) stated that the agency would evaluate the following factors: management/risk, technical/risk, scenario based example/risk,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most