About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413238,B-413238.2 1 (2016-09-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsny0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A    O                                                   Comptroller General
! Accountablity * Integrity * Reliability                                 of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
  Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                       a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                       been approved for public release.
           D e  c i s i o n                          - .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


           Matter of:   Mare Solutions, Inc.

           File:        B-413238; B-413238.2

           Date:        September 14, 2016

           Raymond P. Parker, Esq., and Steven J. Pieklik, Esq., Williams Coulson LLC, and
           James R. Mall, Esq., Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP, for the protester.
           Neil S. Deol, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
           Young S. Lee, Esq., Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the
           General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Protest challenging an evaluation of past performance and technical proposals,
           as well as the agency's best-value decision, is denied where record shows that the
           agency's evaluation and award decision were reasonable and consistent with the
           terms of the solicitation.

           2. Protest alleging that the awardee cannot meet the solicitation's subcontracting
           limitation clause is denied where the protester identifies nothing on the face of the
           awardee's proposal that indicates an intention not to comply with the limitation.
           DECISION

           Mare Solutions, Inc., a service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB)
           of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, protests the award of a contract to SAW Contracting,
           Inc., a SDVOSB of Virginia Beach, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP)
           No. VA244-15-R-1 582, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for boiler
           plant replacement services. Mare contends that the VA's evaluation of its proposal,
           the evaluation of the awardee's proposal, and the agency's award decision were
           unreasonable. Mare also argues that the awardee's proposal failed to provide the
           information necessary to determine whether SAW would comply with the
           subcontracting limitation in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.219-14.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most