About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-412703.2,B-412703.3 1 (2016-08-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsnx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




 G              A   O                                                    Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office  .DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
 Washington, DC 20548
                                                      The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
           Decision                                    been approved for public release.




           Matter of:  New Directions Technologies, Inc.

           File:       B-412703.2; B-412703.3

           Date:       August 18, 2016

           William L. Walsh, Jr., Esq., KeirX. Bancroft, Esq., Nathaniel S. Canfield, Esq., and
           Michael T. Francel, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
           Thomas K. David, Esq., Kenneth D. Brody, Esq., and Katherine A. David, Esq.,
           David, Brody & Dondershine, LLP, for All Points Logistics, LLC, an intervenor.
           Karen M. Reilley, Esq., and Jerry L. Seemann, Esq., National Aeronautics and
           Space Administration, for the agency.
           Matthew T. Crosby, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General
           Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Protest that agency treated the protester and awardee unequally by
           communicating with the awardee after discussions but not the protester is denied
           where the record reflects that the agency's communication with the awardee was a
           clarification and that the protester introduced defects into its proposal after
           discussions that could not have been addressed without reopening discussions.

           2. Protest challenging the source selection authority's (SSA) conclusion that the
           protester's and awardee's proposals were of equal merit under a technical subfactor
           even though the protester's proposal was assessed an additional significant
           strength is denied where the record reflects the SSA considered the underlying
           evaluation findings and concluded that various factors, including a specific aspect of
           the awardee's approach, rendered the proposals technically equal.
           DECISION

           New Directions Technologies, Inc., of Ridgecrest, California, protests the award
           of a contract by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to All Points
           Logistics, LLC, of Huntsville, Alabama, under request for proposals (RFP)
           No. NNM14494731 R for information technology (IT) services to be provided at the
           George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, in Huntsville, Alabama, the National
           Space Science and Technology Center, also in Huntsville, and the Michoud
           Assembly Facility, in New Orleans, Louisiana. New Directions alleges that the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most