About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413091,B-413091.2 1 (2016-08-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadslu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
U n ite d  S tate s  G o v e rn m e n t  A c c o u nta b ility  O ff ice  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington, DC 20548                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                    been approved for public release.
         D  e c is  io n                           ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.



         Matter of:   MicroTechnologies, LLC

         File:        B-413091; B-413091.2

         Date:        August 11, 2016

         Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq., Steven A. Pozefsky, Esq., and Erin L. Felix, Esq.,
         Polsinelli PC, for the protester.
         John S. Pachter, Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., and Mary Pat Buckenmeyer,
         Esq., Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, for BTAS, Inc., the intervenor.
         Lt. Col. Christine C. Piper, Michael J. Farr, Esq., Graeme S. Henderson, Esq., and
         Shandra J. Kotzun, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
         Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Kenneth E. Patton, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the awardee's proposed
         professional employee compensation plan is sustained where the evaluation was
         not adequately documented, the data relied upon by the agency did not provide a
         meaningful basis to evaluate the awardee's proposed compensation, and the
         agency acknowledges that it mistakenly relied upon incorrect data from a salary
         survey.

         2. Protest that discussions with the protester were not meaningful because the
         agency did not inform the protester that its proposed price was higher than the
         awardee's is denied where the agency did not find the protester's proposed price to
         be unreasonable or otherwise unacceptable.
         DECISION

         MicroTechnologies, LLC, of Vienna, Virginia, a small business, protests the
         issuance of a task order to BTAS, Inc., of Beavercreek, Ohio, also a small business,
         by the Department of the Air Force under request for proposals (RFP) No.
         F1AF1C5223AO01 for information technology support services. MicroTechnologies
         argues that the Air Force unreasonably evaluated BTAS's proposed professional
         compensation plan, and failed to conduct meaningful discussions with the protester.


We sustain the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most