About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-412874 1 (2016-05-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsfg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A   O                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: TTCC, Inc.

         File:       B-412874

         Date:       May 17, 2016

         Daniel J. Cragg, Esq., Eckland & Blando LLP, for the protester.
         Col. Matthew J. Mulbarger, Lt. Col. Damund E. Williams, and
         Capt. Christopher J. Elliott, Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
         Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest that agency improperly rejected protester's proposal for airfield grounds
         maintenance services is denied where proposal failed to acknowledge amendment
         to request for proposals that provided new information that would affect offeror's
         performance.
         DECISION

         TTCC, Inc., doing business as Tried & True Corporate Cleaning, of La Mesa,
         California, a small business, protests the rejection of its proposal by the Department
         of the Air Force under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA4625-16-R-0002 for
         airfield grounds maintenance services at Whiteman Air Force Base (AFB), Missouri.
         TTCC argues that although the firm mistakenly failed to acknowledge an
         amendment' in its proposal, the amendment was not material, and thus the Air
         Force acted improperly in rejecting TTCC's proposal.

         We deny the protest.


         1 In its protest, TTCC refers to the amendment at issue as amendment 3 (as the
         amendment was numbered when issued). The Air Force has explained that the
         numbering was incorrect because the second, third, and fourth amendments were
         unnumbered, making amendment 3 actually the sixth amendment. In the interest
         of consistency in this decision, we have adopted the original numbering, so we refer
         to the amendment at issue as amendment 3.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most