About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-197200 1 (1980-01-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadset0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                    COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                              WASHINGTON, D.C. Z0548



 B-197200                         January'7, 1980





 The Honorable Fortney H. Stark.
 House of Representatives

 Dear M~r. Stark:.

      This is in response to a recent letter from your office requesting
 on your behalf our answers to the following question: Is it a violation
 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (Self-Government Act) for the
 City Council (Council) to have enacted legislation affecting the location
 of foreign chanceries in the District? Your reference is to Bill 3-47,
 called The Location of Chanceries Act of 1979. The enactment would amend
 D.C. Code §5-418(c).

      You asked that we expedite our response so that you would have it
 available for congressional debate on the Resolution to disapprove the
 District's enactment. Therefore, we have not been able to give this matter
 as much consideration as we would like. However, we hope the following
 will be of assistance to you.

      We believe that both the letter and the spirit of the District of
 Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, Pub. L. No.
 93-198 (1975), preclude the Council from enacting a law which interferes
 with the Federal/international character of the District. The law in
 question would limit the areas in which foreign governments could locate
 official missions in the District of Columbia.

      Prescribing or limiting the location of chanceries is in our view a
 zoning and planning function subject to the limitations in the Self-Govern-
 ment Act. Section 492 of the Act vests all zoning authority in the District
 Zoning Commission created by the Act. The Zoning Commission consists of
 the Architect of the Capitol, the Director of the National Park Service and
 three members appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the Council. Thus,
 both Federal and District interests are represented on the Commission, but
 Federal interests are not represnted on the Council. While the Self-Govern-
 ment Act is intended to give the District Government substantial authority
 over local land use planning, the Federal interest is further protected
 through the functions of the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC).
 The planning provisions of section 203 of the cited Act were enacted for
 the purpose of preserving NCPC's role and this statutory provision is be-
 yond the amendatory authority of the Council. Section 203(a) of the Act
 vests ultimate authority in NCPC to bar adoption by the District of any






.    .     ... ... 7 ':

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most