About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-412188.2 1 (2016-03-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsbk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
     Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of:   PatriotVetlT, LLC

         File:        B-412188.2

         Date:       March 23, 2016

         Leonard Hawrilenko for the protester.
         Paul K. Petraborg, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
         Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest challenging agency's evaluation of protester's proposal and selection of
         higher-priced, higher technically rated proposal is denied where evaluation and
         selection were reasonable and in accordance with the solicitation evaluation criteria.
         DECISION

         PatriotVetlT, LLC, a service-disabled, veteran-owned, small business, of Sarasota,
         Florida, protests the award of a contract to Dockside Imaging, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant,
         South Carolina, under request for proposals (RFP) No. VA263-15-R-0451, issued
         by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), for mobile magnetic resonance imaging
         (MRI) services. PatriotVetlT argues that the agency misevaluated its technical
         proposal and past performance.

         We deny the protest.

         BACKGROUND

         The RFP, issued on August 3, 2015, as a service-disabled, veteran-owned, small
         business set-aside, sought proposals for the award of an indefinite-delivery,
         indefinite-quantity contract for mobile MRI services. RFP at 1, 57, and 61. The
         RFP set out three factors for award: (1) technical capability; (2) past performance,
         and (3) price. Id. at 57. Award was to be made to the offeror that submitted the
         proposal deemed to present the best value. Id. at 58. The RFP instructed offerors
         to provide sufficient detail in their proposals to allow for the evaluation of technical
         capability. Id. at 57. With regard to past performance, the RFP instructed offerors

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most