About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-412097,B-412097.2 1 (2015-12-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrwo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548
                                                    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                 I The decision issued on the date below was subject to
         Decision                                 a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                  been approvedforpublic release.


         Matter of: Intelsat General Corporation

         File:     B-412097; B-412097.2

         Date:     December 23, 2015

         Andrew E. Shipley, Esq., Lee P. Curtis, Esq., Seth H. Locke, Esq., and William J.
         Bainbridge, Esq., Perkins Coie LLP, for the protester.
         Michael R. Charness, Esq., Jamie F. Tabb, Esq., Elizabeth Krabill McIntyre, Esq.,
         and Tyler Robinson, Esq., Vinson & Elkins LLP, for Segovia, Inc., the intervenor.
         JoAnn W. Melesky, Esq., and Anthony J. Balestreri, Esq., Defense Information
         Systems Agency, for the agency.
         Stephanie B. Magnell, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest alleging that the agency engaged in misleading discussions is sustained
         where the record shows that the agency failed to inform the protester of a change in
         its interpretation of the solicitation requirements after the agency held discussions.

         2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the awardee's proposal is
         sustained, where the record demonstrates that the evaluation was neither
         reasonable nor consistent with the terms of the solicitation regarding requirements
         for satellite coverage and capacity, and where the agency unreasonably concluded
         that the awardee had provided required documentation.

         3. Protest challenging the agency's price realism analysis is sustained where the
         awardee's proposal did not meet the solicitation's technical requirements for
         required documentation and complete regional satellite coverage.
         DECISION
         Intelsat General Corporation, of McLean, Virginia, protests the award of a contract

         to Segovia, Inc., of Reston, Virginia, doing business as Inmarsat Government,' by

         1 In order to differentiate the similar corporate names, throughout this decision we
         have used Segovia to denote the awardee.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most