About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-412255,B-412255.2 1 (2016-01-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrvi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
U n ite d  S tate s  G o v e rn m e n t  A c c o u nta b ility  O ff ice  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington, DC 20548                                   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
         Decision                                    been approved for public release.



         Matter of:   Ultimate Concrete, L.L.C.

         File:        B-412255; B-412255.2

         Date:        January 13, 2016

         Bret S. Wacker, Esq., Thomas M. Keranen, Esq., and Jeffrey M. Gallant, Esq.,
         Clark Hill, PLC, for the protester.
         David A. Rose, Esq., Moser Rose, LLP, for Fortis Networks, Inc., the intervenor.
         Charles L. Webster III, Esq., and Lloyd R. Crosswhite, Esq., Department of the
         Army, Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency.
         Evan D. Wesser, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. An agency improperly permitted the awardee to modify its bid by reallocating
         prices among contract line items after bid submission where there was not clear and
         convincing evidence of the awardee's intended allocation of line item prices.

         2. Notwithstanding the improper reallocation of contract line items, the protester
         failed to establish competitive prejudice where the reallocated bid did not change
         the bidders' relative competitive positions and the agency reasonably found that the
         awardee's originally submitted bid, although mathematically unbalanced, was not
         materially unbalanced, and otherwise reasonably evaluated the risk associated with
         the awardee's proposed pricing.
         DECISION

         Ultimate Concrete, L.L.C., a small business, of El Paso, Texas, protests the award
         of a contract to Fortis Networks, Inc., a small business, of Phoenix, Arizona, under
         invitation for bids (IFB) No. W9126G-15-B-0028, which was issued by the
         Department of the Army, Army Corps of Engineers-Fort Worth District, for the
         replacement of approximately 2.5 miles of an existing section of the United States
         Border Patrol legacy fence in Sunland Park, New Mexico, along the United
         States/Mexico International Border. Ultimate Concrete argues that the Army
         unreasonably allowed Fortis to revise its bid by reallocating contract line items after
         bid submission, and that the Army could not reasonably make award based on
         Fortis' original bid because it was materially unbalanced.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most