About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411884,B-411884.2,B-411884.3,B-411884.4,B-411884.5,B-411884.6 1 (2015-11-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadruz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548                                 .DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                      The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
         Decision                                     been approved for public release.



         Matter of:   Deloitte Consulting, LLP; Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.; CALIBRE
                      Systems, Inc.

         File:        B-411884; B-411884.2; B-411884.3; B-411884.4; B-411884.5;
                      B-411884.6

         Date:        November 16, 2015

         Keith R. Szeliga, Esq., Jonathan S. Aronie, Esq., Katie Calogero, Esq., and
         Matthew W. Turetzky, Esq., Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, for Deloitte
         Consulting, LLP; Kevin C. Dwyer, Esq., Kathy C. Weinberg, Esq., Charles L. Capito,
         Esq., and Rachael K. Plymale, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton,
         Inc.; Craig A. Holman, Esq., Lauren J. Schlanger, Esq., Stuart W. Turner, Esq., and
         Dominique L. Casimir, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, and Brian A. Darst, Esq., Odin,
         Feldman & Pittleman, PC, for CALIBRE Systems, Inc., the protesters.
         Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Steptoe and Johnson, LLP, for PricewaterhouseCoopers
         Public Sector LLP, the intervenor.
         David S. Hurt, Esq., Erik Troff, Esq., David Smith, Esq., Ken Lieb, Esq., and Randy
         Stone, Esq., Defense Health Agency, for the agency.
         Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest challenging the evaluation of the awardee's corporate experience is
         sustained where the record does not reasonably explain why the agency credited
         the awardee with the experience of its corporate parent.

         2. Protest that the awardee's quotation took exception to the solicitation's data
         rights clause is sustained where the quotation clearly limited the government rights
         in a manner contrary to the solicitation.

         3. Protests challenging the evaluation of the awardee's labor mix are sustained
         where the agency made unsupported assumptions regarding the labor mix.

         4. Protests that agency evaluated quotations unequally is sustained where the
         record does not reasonably show the agency's basis for distinguishing between the
         protesters' and the awardee's quotations.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most