About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411897.2,B-411897.4 1 (2015-11-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrrw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                    been approved for public release.
         D  e c i s i o n                          - .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   Protect the Force, Inc.

         File:        B-411897.2; B-411897.4

         Date:        November 24, 2015

         David S. Black, Esq., William M. Pannier, Esq., Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq., and
         Daniel P. Hanlon, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for the protester.
         Paul A. Debolt, Esq., James Y. Boland, Esq., Elizabeth Ann Buehler, Esq., and
         Collier L. Johnson II, Esq., Venable LLP, for Point Blank Enterprises; and Marc
         Lamer, Esq., Kostos & Lamer, P.C., for Short Bark Industries, the intervenors.
         Wade L. Brown, Esq., and Jan S. McNutt, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
         agency.
         Gary R. Allen, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest challenging an agency's evaluation of awardees' technical proposals is
         sustained where the evaluation was not reasonable and not consistent with the
         solicitation's evaluation criteria.
         DECISION

         Protect the Force, Inc. (PTF), of Alpharetta, Georgia, protests the award of
         indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contracts to Point Blank Enterprises, of
         Pompano Beach, Florida; Short Bark Industries, of Vonore, Tennessee; and Carter
         Enterprises, of Brooklyn, New York, under request for proposals (RFP)
         No. W91 CRB-1 5-R-0027, issued by the Department of the Army for ballistic combat
         shirts. PTF alleges several improprieties in the agency's conduct of the
         procurement, including that the agency unreasonably evaluated all of the awardees'
         technical proposals.

         We sustain the protest.

         BACKGROUND

         The RFP was issued on May 20, 2015, for the procurement of ballistic combat shirts
         (BCS) with torso and extremity protection. The RFP contemplated award of up to

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most