About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-198159 1 (1981-02-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrra0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




DECISION




FILE: B-198159


MATTER OF:


DIGEST: 1.


THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON. O.C. 20548


DATE:


February 17, 1981.


The United States Supreme Court's
opinion in United States v. Larionoff,
431 U.S. 864. (1977), concerning military
reenlistment bonuses, did not alter the
fundamental rules of law that (1) a
service member's entitlement to military
pay is governed by statute rather than
ordinary contract principles, and (2)
in the absence of specific statutory
authority the Government is not liable
for the negligent or erroneous acts of
its agents; hence, the amount of any
reenlistment bonus payable to a service
member depends on the applicable statutes
and regulations, and in no event can the
bonus amount be established through
private negotiation or contract between
the member and his recruiter.


              2. A Navy petty officer who reenlisted became
                  entitled to a reenlistment bonus in the
                  amount of $3,209.40, computed under the
                  statutory provisions of 37 U.S.C. 308
                  (1976) and implementing service regula-
                  tions, but a recruiting official miscal-
                  culated the amount of his bonus entitle-
                  ment and entered the higher figure of
                  $3,459.60 in his reenlistment agreement
                  as the amount of the bonus payable to
                  him. Such mistake may not serve as a
                  basis for payment of a bonus to him'
                  in excess of $3,209.40, the amount
                  authorized by statute and regulations.

     This action is in response to a letter with enclosures,
from Louis J. Frymire, Disbursing Officer, Navy Personnel
Support Activity Detachment, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who
requests an advance decision concerning the correct amount
of the selective reenlistment bonus to be paid Petty Officer
(0S3)                                      The question is
whether Petty Officer          should receive the selective
reenlistment bonus amount agreed upon between him and the
United States Navy recruiting officer at the time of his

                                            ?~SEtDECS!


435 C

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most