About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411608,B-411608.3 1 (2015-09-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrmv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
         Decision                                   ap proved for public release.



         Matter of:  Tantus Technologies, Inc.

         File:        B-411608; B-411608.3

         Date:       September 14, 2015

         David S. Cohen, Esq., John J. O'Brien, Esq., Gabriel E. Kennon, Esq., Daniel
         Strouse, Esq., and Amy J. Spencer, Esq., Cohen Mohr LLP, for the protester.
         Jeffery M. Chiow, Esq., Neil H. O'Donnell, Esq., and Lucas T. Hanback, Esq.,
         Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, for the intervenor, Edaptive Systems LLC.
         Douglas Kornreich, Esq., and Tony Ross, Esq., Department of Health and Human
         Services, for the agency.
         Brent Burrs, Esq., and Jennifer Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest is sustained where the agency unreasonably failed to consider, under the
         personnel and management evaluation factor, the awardee's proposed relocation of
         a substantial number of employees after the first year of performance.

         2. Protest is sustained where the agency did not evaluate corporate experience
         and past performance evaluation factor in a manner consistent with the solicitation.

         3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's proposal under the
         technical approach and understanding factor is denied where the protester fails to
         demonstrate that the agency's interpretation of the protester's proposal was
         unreasonable.

         4. Agency's cost realism evaluation is improper where agency failed to recognize
         that awardee proposed to significantly reduce the labor rates of personnel during
         the option years of the task order; however, agency was not required to downwardly
         adjust protester's proposed travel costs that were consistent with the protester's
         technical approach.
         DECISION

         Tantus Technologies, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task
         order to Edaptive Systems LLC, of Owings Mills, Maryland, under request for

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most