About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411305,B-411305.2 1 (2015-07-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrgs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A     O                                                   Comptroller General
       Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
         D e c i s i o n                            L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   Cubic Applications, Inc.

         File:        B-411305; B-411305.2

         Date:        July 9, 2015

         Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Tracye W. Howard, Esq., Nina S. Rustgi, Esq., and Laura
         Sherman, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester.
         Robert S. Metzger, Esq., and Lucas T. Hanback, Esq., Rogers Joseph O'Donnell,
         P.C., for Science Applications International Corporation, the intervenor.
         Capt. Adam N. Olsen, Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
         Robert T. Wu, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
         participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest that the agency unreasonably evaluated the protester's price proposal as
         exceptionally low and, as a result, conducted misleading discussions, is denied
         where the record shows the agency's evaluation was reasonable.

         2. Protest that the agency engaged in disparate treatment between the protester
         and the awardee is sustained where the record shows the agency evaluated the
         protester's optional labor rates as exceptionally low, but without reasonable
         explanation did not similarly evaluate as exceptionally low the awardee's lower-
         priced optional labor rates, and there is a reasonable possibility that the protester
         was prejudiced by the agency's actions.
         DECISION

         Cubic Applications, Inc., of San Diego, California, protests the issuance of a task
         order to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), of McLean, Virginia,
         by the Department of the Air Force under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA4890-
         12-D-OOXX-0065 for program security support services. Cubic argues that the Air
         Force improperly evaluated its proposal as exceptionally low in price, and
         conducted misleading discussions by informing the firm that its price was
         exceptionally low during several rounds of discussions. Cubic also argues that the
         agency disparately evaluated price proposals.


We deny the protest in part and sustain it in part.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most