About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

113272 1 (1980-01-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrgo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 









Who Audits the

Auditors?


WUiJiam J. Schad
   t,, -nai   a;n assisiani re-yional
   v:er   Atlr, Chdgo ieoional office
   Hp P~~-;ved a. .-n audit rnanaget
            rnlati r,.'  )I office. Mf
     Si  .amomber andI past president.
     C  1--i.crPier. Absoclation ol Govern-
     A~ iu rns. a ,emfired professional
             , tand fc inpal moderator for
   ~ ~ F% Tum   ct'vtres. As ctlairper-
       NAu~ Miceslern In)tergovernmental
   k~\U I jrnMr Sct~ad mnanaged Iho
          _'_' ) ()of the peer quality
       and in e tvipwE, and( is the
          '~~'~ v Kesefi of


  The title question is, quite legiti-
mately. often posed by those
subject to the eyes and ears of
auditors, Agencies spend about $1
billion every year to conduct Inter-
nal audits of agency management
and external audits of grantees and
contractors. So that this spending
may result In improved program
operations, audit organizations
need periodic evaluation to ensure
the quality of their audits.
  Periodic evaluation Is Important,
not only to maintain audit quality.
but to maintain confidence in that
quality among program managers.
legislators, and other audit groups.
Auditors need each others confi-
dence to avoid unnecessary repeti-
tive audits of the same agency,
contractor, or grantee-as called
for by Office of Management and
Budget Circular A-102. They need
legislators' confidence to avoid the
budget cutters scissors. Most of
all, they need the confidence of
program managers, who must act
on their audit findings. Equally
essential Is their credibility in the
eyes of the taxpayers, whose faith
In government depends partly on
them.

Am Aswer

  In May 1978, members of the
Midwestern Intergovermental Au-
dit Forum   met to discuss the
question of who should audit the
auditors. Its conclusion? Other
auditors-
  The forum set out to devise a peer
assessment system. First, we
drafted an evaluation guide consis-
tent with audit standards of the
Comptroller General and the Ameri-
can Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, The guide Included
various evaluation standards for the
auditing organization to meet, ac-
companied by aids. or criteria, to
help a review team assess compli-
ance. This guide was then sent to
forum members for comment- At-
firming their support for the project,
10 agency directors offered their
organizations as guinea pigs and
nearty 50 audit supervisors and


managers volunteered for test re-
view teams.

Testing the Answer

  The forum established a commit-
tee to fashion questionnaires, de-
sign a scoring system, and manage
the reviews. The committee chose
one agency at each level-Federal,
State, and local-and coose five-
member teams for each review-
Team members represented three
Federal Inspector General Offices,
the General Accounting Office, and
three State and two local govern-
ment audit agencies.
  During a forum meetinG following
the tests. panels of team leaders
and organization directors candidly
described their review experiences.
We learned that the tests fostered a
fuller understanding of the system
among forum members, the com-
mittee, review teams, and agency
officials. Also significant was the
bonus to the agencies-prof as-
sional interchange and advice on
how policies, procedures, and audit
work could be Improved.
  For our part, the improvements
needed were
     a clear distinction between
      evaluation standards and
      aids.
     a clear reporting format and
      coherence among the various
      instruments, and
     a clear way to decide on
      compliance with evaluation
      standards.

 Revising the Answer

 To make the improvements, the
 forum's Executive Administrator
 and the committee chairperson
 subjected each standard, aid, and
 questionnaire statement, line by
 line. to a seemingly endless list of
 suggestions and critiques from
 committee members, team mem-
 bers, and agency directors. While
 the process took several months
 and was sometimes discouraging,
 we made progress and our concern
 turned again to enthusiastic opti-
 mism.
          GAO   e 1cw/Summer 11986

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most