About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411229.2 1 (2015-06-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadreq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




 G             A    O                                                   Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Graybar

          File:        B-411229.2

          Date:        June 22, 2015

          Ron Drescher, for the protester.
          William L. Walsh, Jr., Esq., and Christina K. Scopin, Esq., Venable, LLP, for
          Science Applications International Corporation, the intervenor.
          Nicole M. Franchetti, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency.
          Stephanie B. Magnell, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest is denied where there is no evidence that the agency acted in bad faith, the
          agency did not err in its price evaluation, and the agency's evaluation of the
          awardee's past performance was reasonable.
          DECISION

          Graybar, of Lanham, Maryland, protests award by the Defense Logistics Agency
          (DLA) of a supply services contract to Science Applications International
          Corporation (SAIC), of McLean, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. SPM8E3-14-R-0004. Graybar contends that DLA evaluated its proposal in bad
          faith, erred in its evaluation of items from the price evaluation list (PEL), and
          improperly evaluated SAIC's past performance.' Protest at 1-3.

          1 Graybar was not represented by counsel in this protest. Accordingly, our Office
          did not issue a protective order, and Graybar was provided a redacted version of
          the agency report. In resolving the protest, we reviewed unredacted copies of all
          evaluation and source selection documents in camera, and we have based our
          decision on the full record. As much of the information reviewed by our Office is
          source selection sensitive and proprietary in nature, our discussion of the evaluation
          is necessarily limited. Additionally, although we do not address every argument
          raised by the protester, we have reviewed each issue and find that none provides a
          basis to sustain the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most